<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thom's House &#187; Broken Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomshouse.net/category/broken-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomshouse.net</link>
	<description>Rants and raves from another codemonkey with a blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:34:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Broken Record: Firefox Bugfixes</title>
		<link>http://thomshouse.net/2009/03/broken-record-firefox-bugfixes/</link>
		<comments>http://thomshouse.net/2009/03/broken-record-firefox-bugfixes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broken Records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomshouse.net/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every time an update to Firefox is released, I hear the same conversation:
&#8220;Oh no, does this mean Firefox isn&#8217;t secure?&#8221;
&#8220;I think so&#8230;  There were six critical vulnerabilities in this release!&#8221;
&#8220;Did you know that more vulnerabilities were reported for Firefox last year than for any other browser?  Firefox had four times more vulnerabilities than Internet Explorer?&#8221;
&#8220;ROFL [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time an <a href="http://digg.com/security/Firefox_3_0_7_targets_security_issues">update to Firefox</a> is released, I hear the same conversation:</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh no, does this mean Firefox isn&#8217;t secure?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I think so&#8230;  There were six critical vulnerabilities in this release!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Did you know that <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/03/fanning_the_flames_of_the_brow.html">more vulnerabilities were reported for Firefox last year</a> than for any other browser?  Firefox had four times more vulnerabilities than Internet Explorer?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;ROFL that&#8217;s why I just use IE.&#8221;</p>
<p>I really do hear this conversation <em>every time</em>, and unfortunately it&#8217;s an apples-to-oranges scenario.</p>
<p><strong>Myth:</strong></p>
<p>Because Firefox has so many vulnerabilities and bugfixes, it must not be as secure as people think.</p>
<p>Fact:</p>
<p>Firefox has so many <em>publicly disclosed</em> vulnerabilities because it is the most popular open-source browser.  This means thousands of people can look at the program code and <em>see</em> where there are vulnerabilities.  Compare this to IE, where only Microsoft programmers have access to the raw code.  If they discover a vulnerability, they don&#8217;t have to report it or even patch it until it becomes an active threat.  I&#8217;m guessing, in most cases, they don&#8217;t patch any but the most serious vulnerabilities, because it&#8217;s a waste of man-hours to attempt to perfect an old version of the browser.  (Most of their resources are probably focused on Internet Explorer 8 at this point.)</p>
<p>So of course Internet Explorer will have fewer disclosed vulnerabilities&#8230;  However, I&#8217;m willing to bet that a very high percentage of these vulnerabilities are actually exploited by hackers.  As for Firefox, the public bug tracker might be loaded with reported vulnerabilities, but I can count on a single hand the number of times these have translated to an actual, real-world exploit on the loose.</p>
<p>And more bugfixes is a good thing&#8211;it means Firefox is being patched and made secure more quickly than IE and other browsers.</p>
<p>If you still need convincing, try this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ask 10 Firefox users and 10 Internet Explorer users how frequently they have been infected by a virus or spyware in the past year.</li>
<li>Ask 10 Firefox advocates, who have forced their families and friends to switch to Firefox, if their family&#8217;s computer woes have increased or decreased since the change.</li>
</ul>
<p>I have switched my entire family over, and the only one who&#8217;s had problems is my Aunt, whose kids were smart enough to create an administrator account for themselves and undo the security I put in place, but not, apparently, smart enough to forego Internet Explorer.  I&#8217;ve run Firefox for the past five years at work, and the only time I&#8217;ve gotten a virus is the <em>five minutes</em> I loaned my laptop to someone else, after which they handed it back with&#8230;  sigh&#8230;  Internet Explorer up and running.  Do the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomshouse.net/2009/03/broken-record-firefox-bugfixes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
